Oh what a Knight!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e757/7e7574d5e477586ab4b754190728bc1eadc342fb" alt=""
I just got home from watching The Dark Knight, and I can still feel the adrenaline pumping through me as if I had just chugged a gallon of coffee or jogged home from the Promenade. There are movies that take your breath away because of the fantastic cinematography ,or the dazzling special effects, or the powerful performances. TDK does all that, but it also literally takes your breath away because you just can't stand the suspense. More than once throughout its run of 2 hours and 40 minutes, I found myself leaning forward in my seat, or clutching my armrests, or covering my mouth in anxiety. When the end credits started to roll, I slumped back and exhaled, exhausted and exhilarated at the same time.
So yes, happily, all the hype proves true: The Dark Knight is phenomenal. Not only does it redefine the Batman franchise (which director Christopher Nolan helped resuscitate with Batman Begins), it redefines everything we have come to expect from a superhero movie. This is a superhero FILM, where the hero is more than a caped-and-cowled crime-fighter with a souped-up vehicle and high-tech gadgets, where the villain is more than a homicidal loon with a painted face, where the conflict is more than just good versus evil. In TDK, the lines between hero and villain, and right and wrong, are blurred, and the moral dilemmas faced by the central characters are what propel the movie forward and keep the viewers' hearts racing, more than the stunts or the action sequences or the fight scenes. This is a story of crime and corruption, of a system gone rotten, of monsters wreaking havoc, of decent men and women turning into the very monsters they battle. Psychotic clown in costume aside, it seems not only all too possible, but all too painfully familiar. I wouldn't go so far as to say TDK functions as a realistic, thought-provoking social commentary, but for a big-budget blockbuster about a vigilante who dresses up as a bat, it's about as philosophical as you can get.
Christian Bale is without question the best Batman and Bruce Wayne we've seen onscreen. Batman has always been my favorite superhero precisely because he's not superhuman, and he has never been more human as portrayed in TDK, where he grapples with the enormous responsibility of safeguarding an ungrateful Gotham City, and coming to terms with the personal sacrifices that have to be made for the greater good. Thanks to Bale's intensity (he sometimes reminds me of Johnny Depp in that way), this internal struggle is conveyed with both subtlety and clarity, reflecting the class of actor he is. It also helps that he's surrounded by a trio of acting legends who deliver expectedly stellar supporting performances as Batman's closest allies: Michael Caine as Alfred, Gary Oldman as Lt. Jim Gordon, and Morgan Freeman as Lucius Fox. Meanwhile, Aaron Eckhart turns in what in my opinion is a breakthrough performance as Harvey Dent, the upstanding, seemingly incorruptible District Attorney who's on a crusade against the mob leaders of Gotham. As Dent, Eckhart is convincingly charismatic, and captures the idealistic fervor of an honest public servant trying to make a difference. Maggie Gyllenhaal is infinitely less annoying than Katie Holmes as Rachel Dawes, the love interest of both Bruce Wayne and Harvey Dent, but there were times when I felt as if she were playing Mrs. Tom Cruise playing Rachel rather than giving her own portrayal of the character. Knowing Gyllenhaal's fantastic range as an actress, I was a bit disappointed with her this time.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7eb2/c7eb2bd0ea64cd3b1c62b68d0b79eab5856b2e64" alt=""
Chris Nolan has outdone himself with what feels to be not so much a sequel to Batman Begins as a follow-up project that passes its predecessor in all standards of style and substance. The only problem now is how he's going to top himself next time. He's certainly going to be hard-pressed to find someone else to play the Joker, so I doubt he'll even try. But if anyone can live up to and exceed our expectations, Nolan can. And until the next installment in his Batman series, we have the lingering, horrifying, brilliant images of Heath Ledger's Joker to tide us over. May we never forget the madness of the monster, and the genius of the man.
2 Comments:
In a word, the movie was incredible. It had everything that I wanted to see in a superhero movie - serious moral dilemma, a good hard look at background reality, and a sharp contrast between those who live by the rules and those with absolutely no regard for those same rules. Then the movie kicked it up two notches further, and let everything sink in.
While I credit the writers and the director for the sheer impact of the film, I can't deny that Heath Ledger was very good. He played his part to the very hilt, and the movie greatly benefited because of it; his Joker will be remembered as one of the best villains ever brought to the screen.
That said, I can name a number of scenes that I loved. Without giving anything away, I'll mention the ferry scene, the Batmobile backup, the assassination attempt, the twist, the double twist, the implanted cellphone, the mountain of cash, the final fate of Rachel's letter, and every single scene that involved the two-headed coin. There are quite a few award-giving bodies that probably won't recognize this movie because it's "not their type", but it's a winner in my book already.
That ferry scene had my stomach all tied up in knots. My friend Yang said it would make a great topic of discussion in a Philo class. Haha.
And the Batpod totally kicked ass. =D
Post a Comment
<< Home